0D (DCRB-AACR2 analysis)

[Patrick Russell]

Hi all:

1; agree

2: Agree, also similar portions of other sections

3; Retail note for data from elsewhere

4; Areas/elements -- not sure what is at issue here -- yes, reflect MARC,
but are we saying that contents of areas/elements should be though of in
terms of MARC fields, which is what in fact happens when cataloging (as I
do) dirctly in MARC rather than producing a worksheet of "cataloging
areas/elements"  which is later "made MARC" by someone else.

In other words, at this point in DCRB I'm not sure that the issue is really
"cards vs. MARC" but rather "what are those areas/elements which need to be
delimited concerning item(s) in order to provide cataloging data, whether
the output form is cards, microform, online cat. in SGML or MARC, etc.

Patrick

At 03:11 PM 6/3/99 -0600, Robert Maxwell wrote:
>
>http://www.lib.byu.edu/~catalog/people/rlm/bsc/dcrb/0D.htm
>
>Recommendations: 
>
>        1.Reword 0D so that its language is the same as AACR2 1.0B1 and
>2.0B2. Remove "explanatory" language that should be self-evident. Remove
>the sentence "For the sole purpose of applying ..." and change references
>to "special" sources to "prescribed" sources. 
>        2.Rename the Publication, etc. area the Publication, distribution,
>etc. area (this will affect chapter 4, too), but retain the order of the
>prescribed sources. 
>        3.Retain the stipulation of the note for data taken from elsewhere
>than the t.p. for first three areas; retain details about prescribed
>sources for single sheets (but revise the glossary). 
>        4.Reword "areas" and "elements" language to take into account MARC
>realities vs. the card environment.
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Robert L. Maxwell
>Special Collections and Ancient Languages Cataloger
>6428 Harold B. Lee Library
>Brigham Young University
>Provo, UT 84602
>(801) 378-5568
>robert_maxwell@byu.edu
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>