[DCRB-L] Repeatability of printing information
John Attig
dcrb-l@lib.byu.edu
Mon, 02 Jun 2003 12:11:57 -0400
At the DCRM Conference, it was indicated that field 260 subfields $e, f, g
(Place of printing, name of printer, date of printing) would need to be
made repeatable in order to accommodate nineteenth-century books. I
volunteered to draft a MARC format revision proposal.
Unfortunately, I have been unable to find any examples that would require
repeating these subfields, either in DCRB or in ISBD(A). If anybody has
any such examples, I would be delighted to have them.
John Attig
Cataloging Services
Penn State University Libraries
jxa16@psulias.psu.edu